Wednesday 1 June 2016

THE KAMPALA CITY COUNCIL AUTHORITY ACT(KCCA ACT) GREATLY MODIFIES THE IMPLEMENTATION OF DECENTRALISATION WITH REGARDS TO KAMPALA CITY. ANALYZE THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE KCCA UNDER THE KCCA ACT AND OTHER LOCAL GOVERNMENTS STILL OPERATING UNDER THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT



THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND CENTRAL GOVERNMENT IN KAMPALA
Kamarabe john
Student
Ucu law school





























The government system in Uganda is divided between the central government and the local government. Central government is composed of the cabinet[1], public corporations, Tribunal and Police while local government is restricted in specified areas and powers. According to the Concise Law Dictionary[2] to decentralize is to recognize into smaller more autonomous units and to disperse. Decentralisation is the legal administrative and political transfer of power and authority from the center to lower government[3]. The policy was the outcome of series of laws, and commissions’ conferences.
The Local Government Act was enacted in 1987 with a view of affecting the principles of devolution and decentralisation of powers to local government units. The Local Government Act implements the principle that all power belongs to the people as enshrined in the constitution[4]. It also puts in place systems which ensure that people through their duly elected representatives remain in charge of planning, monitoring and execution of all policies. Article 176 of the 1995 constitution of Uganda provides the principles applicable to the local government system. It was enacted in line with Article 206
Before the coming into force of the Kampala City Council Act, Kampala was administered by Kampala city council. In 2010, the Kampala City Council Act 2010 was enacted by the parliament to provide in accordance with Article 5 of the constitution for Kampala as the capital city of Uganda and also to provide for the administration of Kampala by the central government. . The Local Government Act is different from the Kampala City Council Act 2010 because of the following reasons
Differences in the management system.
Under the management system of the local government, there are local government tender boards provided for under Section 91 of the Act. This board is responsible to provide services to the district councils, county council and administrative units pursuant to Section 91 of the Act while in Kampala City Council Act 2010, the board does not exist this has created a question in courts on how one can endorse land transfer in Kampala.

Differences in the composition structure
Section 10 of the LGA provides that the district councils are composed of the district chairperson, one councilor directly elected to represent an electoral area of a district, two councilors, one of whom shall be female youth, excluding the representatives of professional bodies while the Kampala City Council Act 2010 consists on one councilor representing each profession in Section 6 of the Act which include Uganda institution of professional engineers, Uganda society of architects , Uganda medical association and Uganda law society.

Under decentralisation, power is transferred from the central government to the local people. In the local Government Act under section 16, the district executive committee is composed of a large number of executives which include the chairperson, vice chairperson, such number of secretaries, not exceeding vice as the council may determine while the Kampala City Council Act 2010 only consists of one executive who is the executive director[5] to perform a number of functions hence limiting decentralisation. This implies that that the local government act illustrates the large number of participation of the people in decision making than the KCCA Act hence decentralisation
Differences in legislative power
The LGA confers powers to the council in any ordinance to delegate its powers to legislate to a council[6] this delegation principle allows the maximum participation of people in making laws hence decentralisation while, in the Kampala City Council Act, there is no such principle of delegation of powers but only limited to the authority pursuant to section 8 of the Act
Differences in the independence from the central government:
The Kampala City Council Act 2010 expresses that Kampala city is under the control of the central government as illustrated by Article 5(4) of the constitution[7]. This implies that Kampala is still under the administration of the central government since implementations of the authority is done by the central government hence limited decentralisation. However, the LGA is made to ensure that power is transferred from the central government to the local government pursuant to Article 176(2). The councils duly implement, and manage the authority independently without the interference of the central government under section 17 of the Act.
Differences in functions
Under the KCCA Act, during the execution of the Executive Director's functions, he/she makes reports to the council and the minister of state and minister of state and affairs of the city under section 19. This means that the authority is not independent since the accountability is in the hands of the central government while, in the Local Government Act, the chairperson makes the report to the council on the state of affairs of the district under section 13 of the Act. This further shows that the local government is independent of the central government
Differences in the executive powers
Under Article 180 of the constitution of Uganda, the local government has both executive and legislative powers but the executive powers only relate to the formulation and implementation policies under section 17 of the Local Government Act. Section 9 of the Act justifies the jurisdiction of the council in the area in that the council has the highest corporate authority which authority is only limited with in that area of jurisdiction. The local government council does not exercise power beyond his/her geographical area since doing such would be ultra vires. This was confirmed in UGMA ENGINEERING V LUGAZI TOWN COUNCIL[8] where it was held that the local council cannot exercise powers beyond its gazzeted units. Hence the central government authority is limited in the LGA since the executive committee is appointed by the council it’s self. However, in the Kampala City Council Act, the executive director appointed by the central government as the head of the authority under section 19 this was emphasized in the case of Erias Lukwago The Lord Mayor V Jennifer Musisi The Executive Director Misc No 116 Of 2011 where the justice held that the executive director had more power than the lord mayor in the authority. She is vested with power to execute the procurement and disposal process as provided by section 26[9] of the PPDA act and section 19 of Kampala City Council Act 2010 as agreed In Inyatsi Construction Ltd Multi Plex Ltd V Kampala City Council Authority& Executive Director Kampala City Council Authority[10]. The administrative power of the executive director is derived from the president who is the appointing authority. The president is the same authority that removes the executive director from office under sections 17 - 19 of the Act
Differences in accountability.
In the performance of their functions, the chairperson in the Local Government Act is answerable to the district council under Section 13(4) while in the Kampala City Council Act; the lord mayor is answerable to the authority and the Minister (central government) under section 11(2). This implies that in the Local Government Act, the chairperson is independent of the central government hence he makes decisions only with the people but in the Kampala City Council Act, the lord mayor is not independent of the central government since he is answerable to the minister which minister is a member of the central government
Differences in appointment
The executive in the Kampala City Council Act 2010 is appointed by the central government on the advice of the public service commission under section 17(2) while the district executive committee in the LGA is appointed by the district council under Article 186 of the constitution. This means that well as there is decentralisation in the Kampala City Council Authority, there is still central government intervention since the executive director is appointed by the president compared to the Local Government Act where the district council appoints their executive committee independently
Difference in control from the central government.
Under the local Government, the line minister has limited powers to coordinate activities within a particular local Government under Section 95 of the Local Government Act. The minister's mandate is also limited to monitoring and coordinating government policies, advise persons and organizations in relation to projects involving direct relations with the local Government under section 97 of the Act, inspecting and monitoring of local Government under section 98 of the Act but it does not go beyond implementing and managing the authority to ensure that functions, powers and responsibility are devolved and transferred from the government to local Government units under Article 176 (2) of the constitution of Uganda. However, under the Kampala City Council Act, the central government through the Executive Director is given more jurisdiction in the control of the authority by heading the authority and its administration section  19 (a) in conformity with Article (5) 4 of the Constitution of the Republic of Uganda
It can therefore be argued that well as the KCCA under the KCCA Act modifies the system of decentralisation in Uganda, it is still under the control of the central government compared to the local government authority in the Local Government Act which duly justifies decentralization.
BIBLIOGRAPTHY
THE 1995 CONSTITUTION OF UGANDA AS AMENDED
THE KAMPALA CITY COUNCIL AUTHORITY ACT 2010 CAP 281
THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1997 CAP 243
THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AND DISPOSAL OF PUBLIC
ASSETS ACT, 2003
Decentralisation and transformation of governance in uganda. BY D. ASIIMWE & NOKANYIKE B.M FUNCTION PUBLISHERS KAMPALA

Other sources











QUESTION:              THE  KAMPALA CITY COUNCIL AUTHORITY ACT(KCCA ACT) GREATLY MODIFIES THE IMPLEMENTATION OF DECENTRALISATION WITH REGARDS TO KAMPALA CITY. ANALYZE THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE KCCA UNDER THE KCCA ACT AND OTHER LOCAL GOVERNMENTS STILL OPERATING UNDER THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT


[1] Article 111(1) 1995 constitution Ugandathere shall be a cabinet which shall consist of the president, the vice president, the prime minister and such number of ministers as may appear to the president to be reasonably necessary for the efficient running of the state”.
[2] The concise law dictionary
[3] Decentralisation and transformation of governance in Uganda. By D. Asiimwe & Nokanyike B.M function publishers kampala
[4] Article 1(1) Constitution 1995 Ugandaall power belongs o the people who shall exercise its sovereignty in accordance with this constitution”
[5] section 17 of the KCCA Act 2010
[6] section 38 (6) Local Government Act
[7]The territory boundary of Buganda shall be the capital city of Uganda and shall be administered by the central government
[8] Ugma Engineering v Lugazi Town Council Civil appeal no 33 of 1990
[9] The accounting officer of a procuring and disposing entity shall have  shall have overall responsibility for execution of the procurement ……..
[10] Inyatsi Construction Ltd Multi Plex Ltd V Kampala City Council Authority& Executive Director Kampala City Council Authority Miscellaneous Application No 290 of 2013

No comments:

Post a Comment